Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Literateur: "Clans of the Alphane Moon" by Philip K. Dick

I devour Philip K. Dick books like potato chips.

The man has gone from a fringe counter-culture writer to an established member of the literary establishment.1

Dick wrote dozens of books in the 60's on speed and the quality was amazingly consistent for a junkie. They zig and zag with much zazz. There's always an amorphous hyperintelligent alien race, a deranged psychic, a psychedelic drug that warps reality along with minds, androids with more sentience than humans, a false messiah, moon bases firing doomsday weapons at Earth, a completely different version of world history, creaky technology destroying the fabric of society, and mentally ill characters conspiring against each other...and themselves.

His work all blends together. I love everything he wrote,2 but if you ask me to tell you about the plot of "Galactic Pot-Healer" or the protagonist in "Counter-Clock World," I'll serve you up a blank stare.
"Clans of the Alphane Moon" melts nicely into his mind-bending 60's ouvre, and I can cheerfully report that I have no idea what was going on for most of it. But it was a fun ride!

A couple is getting divorced and they get enmeshed in an intergalactic CIA conspiracy against a distant planet's moon with seven different factions divided by their different mental illnesses battling against each other. There's a television stand-up comedian who's secretly a spy, a sentient Ganymedian slime mold manipulating the main character, lasers firing from all directions, and no one knowing who to trust or knowing what's real.

You know. The usual stuff.

If you like Dick, you will like this book. If you don't like Dick, you either haven't read him or you're wrong. If you haven't read him, this isn't the best place to start.3 And if you're wrong- I can't help you.

* * *

1. He has three volumes of his work- 14 books total- collected and published by the Library of America.

2. Exception: I don't like Dick's non-sf work. "Confessions of a Crap Artist" was a real chore to get through and I've skimmed a couple other "literary" works of his and they're really not much fun. With no technology or aliens or future shock or reality-shifting antics, they feel like an artist working with shackles.

3. As a starting point, try "Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch" or "Ubik" or "Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said."


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Friday, July 24, 2015

Cinemasterworks: No-Attention Span Reviews

"Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!"
Better than "Citizen Kane" and "Casablanca" combined.

"Force of Execution"
They put an overweight, over-the-hill Steven Seagal on the poster for this to give you the illusion that it's not really about a no-name actor that Seagal's character sends on a boring mission. Illusion didn't work on me!1

"Wild Wild West"
Everything about this film is wrong.

"Brick Mansions"
This is the last completed movie starring Paul Walker, the white guy from the "Fast" and/ or "Furious" movies. It's decent. Some cool suspense, nice gritty urban Detroit landscape. Feels more like a throwback to 80's near-future paranoid action films like "Dead-End Drive-In" than a modern action romp. And that's fine.

"Furious 7"
Perfect.

"Without a Paddle"
Burt Reynolds' cameo as D.B. Cooper's partner-in-crime was awesome. And when the hillbillies attacked, I was like "Hey, that's Kubiak from 'Parker Lewis Can't Lose'!" Absolutely nothing else in this film connected. Every character arc was contrived and forced. And it's just not funny.

"Scary Movie 5"
Unwatchable. I tried. It refused to be watched.
"An Honest Liar"
Superb documentary about professional debunker James Randi, showing the conflicts he faced in his own life along with the lies he exposed all around him.

"Leprechaun: Origins"
If you thought they couldn't make a worse "Leprechaun" film than "Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood," you thought wrong.

"The Haunting" (1999)
This is a remake of one of my favorite films from the 60's. The CGI was gratuitous and 90's-level bad. But they tried.

"Penny Dreadful"
The Frankenstein monster was well-portrayed and there were some fun moments here and there. But every episode felt like a dull rambling slag periodically interrupted by ridiculously over-the-top obscenity. Ironically, if it hadn't been so obscene, the rest might not have seemed so dull by comparison!

"Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit"
It's okay. Kudos to director Kenneth Branagh for getting Mikhail Baryshnikov to play a villain.

"Atari: Game Over"
Tries to defend legendarily bad "E.T." Atari game. No dice. Just because it maybe wasn't THAT awful compared to games of its time...doesn't make it good.

"TMNT" (2014)
Not as bad as "Transformers 2."
"Lost Soul: The Doomed Journey of Richard Stanley's Island of Doctor Moreau"
Brilliant unmaking-of and making-of an absolutely bizarre film. Hypnotizing, on a level with "Jodorowsky's Dune," another making-of documentary about a movie that never got made.

"Jurassic World"
Bizarrely cruel, sexist, and it collapses in the third act with a stupid ending that sounds cool when you describe it but makes no sense in action. Entertaining, though.

* * *

1. Now I'm ASSUMING Seagal never appears again after the first 10 minutes because I stopped watching as soon as his character exited. I've seen enough low-budget trash to know when I'm being swindled by that "get a celebrity to briefly appear in your movie and then say he stars in it" trick. And I reject that ol' sunk cost fallacy that tricks us into watching the whole movie.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Literateur: George R.R. Martin's "Dying of the Light"

You may know this George R. R. Martin guy from the books with the games and the thrones and whatnot.

But the big guy had a rich and varied career in horror, science fiction, fantasy, and television before he started his "Song of Ice of Ice and Fire."

And this is where it all began, in 1977- his first novel, "Dying of the Light."
The writing is beautiful. Martin had a rich command of the English language right out of the gate.

The setting is awesome. In short- there's a ring of stars around a red sun and the planet we're on is just randomly drifting through space, sustaining life based on its temporary proximity to this celestial phenomena.1

It's getting colder as the planet drifts further from the sun. You might say...WINTER IS COMING.

The last remnants of the people on the planet are fighting about this and that. Gotta fight about something. Our three main characters are in a doomed love triangle, fueled by Martin's broken heart.2 It's all very emotional and affecting.

This is an insanely complex setting and story and the author crams it all into a tight 300 pages.3

Now, full disclosure- I got about 50 pages in before the relentless info-dumping and log-jammed exposition wore me down. I skimmed a bit of it because people go on and on and on about every aspect of the planet's history and all the customs of all 14 of its cultures.4

So, this is a fun, clever, well-written, compelling, sad, flawed book. Amazingly good for a first novel.

I think this Martin guy has a lot of potential.

* * *

1. It owes a lot to Jack Vance's "Dying Earth" series, which was also super-fatalistic with its far-future Earth lit by a dying red sun. Vance was a better writer and his books had a better sense of humor, though.

2. He dedicates the book "for Rachel- who loved me once." Martin was already a sad romantic four decades ago.

3. Plus a richly-detailed glossary, if you want to dig deeper into the milieu.

4. I thought it was a stand-alone but there's other stories and books set in this world, as well. Oh well. Martin always had trouble leaving well enough alone.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

Cinemasterworks: "Nightbreed: The Cabal Cut"

I reviewed the comic books based on this film, so what the heck, let's review the film itself, since Netflix recently dropped the anticipated-for-decades Director's Cut.1
We've always noticed glitches in Clive Barker's second film- an adaptation of his novel "Cabal," which is basically "X-Men" with monsters & murderers instead of mutants- but we all assumed they were due to severe studio recutting.2 Now with Barker's complete vision laid bare, the truth can be told.

The studio was not entirely to blame.

For starters, the lack of character development is a non-starter.

It's supposed to be a big deal that Boone, the hero, is willing to violate The Law- the 'breed code of conduct- but the part where he was taught The Law and integrated into the Midian monster society is almost totally skipped over. This is basic Hero's Journey stuff, people! And this was 1990, for goodness' sake! You could at least throw us a training-montage bone!

And heck, the Law seems pretty antiquated and disregarded even before Boone is initiated. One 'breeder, Peloquin, flat-out says "F--- the law" when it gets in the way of him devouring some human meat in Midian. And Peloquin is a veteran Nightbreed. So it's really not a shocker to have our hero disregard the law. He'd been a member of the 'breed for, what, a day and a half at that point?

Plus, the Law has no impact because we don't know what or why it is. They could have given us some brief explanations, something like "We don't eat meat because some of us are half-animal and that blurs the lines. We don't kill or use weapons except in self-defense, because we've been used as slave-soldiers in the past." Stuff that makes sense.

Peloquin has no arc, either. His initial appearance where he bites and infects Boone is striking- he has the best lines,3 he looks great, he defies The Law,4 he sets a prophecy in motion by biting Boone,5 and he's clearly got a watchdog role by the monsters' front door. He's important. But then at the end of the film, he's just another foot soldier. After he bit Boone, there was no more reason to have him in the film.

The film's basic mechanics are faulty, too. When the monsters rescue Boone from jail, the suspense is killed by Boone's girlfriend taking several minutes to smooch and catch up with Boone IN HIS JAIL CELL, MID-JAIL BREAK. And while this stuff is happening, the monster's home is under attack, making it extra-annoying that the narrative is being halted for romantic chit-chat.6 So when they get back to Midian and it's blowing up and they're like "We're too late!" I'm sitting here like "Yeah, if only you'd gotten there a few minutes earlier. Like maybe if you hadn't STOPPED COLD FOR SEVERAL MINUTES TO MAKE OUT IN THAT JAIL CELL!?!

The monster who ripped the skin off his head- Narcisse- wasn't killed by Decker in the 1990 studio cut. He's killed in the "Cabal Cut." But his death or survival doesn't affect the plot at all. He's the most charismatic character in the movie,7 so it's odd that he really gets no character arc and his death or survival is such a non-event in both versions.

And the film's biggest weakness: Boone doesn't really work as a "Chosen One."

It's not just that he's a bland cipher with no back story or clear motivation or values. It's the way that the bland cipher is used. Theoretically, Boone is an ideal Nightbreed Ambassador to the human race because he can look human and he's very hard to kill. He does not make good use of these advantages, and winds up in jail very quickly.

Supposedly, Boone's prophesied by the Nightbreed god Baphomet to be "Cabal," the one destined to free the monsters from hiding underground. But to what effect? He encourages them to fight back at the end...and they don't do a very good job at it. Bite a few people, punch a few people, hit a few people with sticks. Listen, Cabal- I know Spartacus, and you are no Spartacus.

The 'breed get viciously mowed down by heavy weaponry and are barely shown taking any humans out at all.  They evacuate right into the line of fire.  And when they fight, they fight like bad guys. "Go out there and just kind of run around! Attack in waves of like three of four guys so they can gang up on you! There's a bunch of trees around, so make sure not to stand behind them! Here are some sticks to swat at people with!" And there's no explanation for why the super-monsters- the Berserkers- weren't sent out first, or at least, before dozens of them were killed. And then the Berserkers just flip a couple police cars and WWF-punch a handful of humans with about as much gusto as Tor Johnson in "Plan 9 from Outer Space."

To Barker's credit, he at least has Midian getting hit with shock-and-awe level firepower. The monsters are getting bombed to the point that their lair was collapsing. You clearly get the impression that the inexplicably maniacal and fanatical cops were gonna keep attacking until the 'breed were driven out. So it at least made sense that they needed to evacuate- the place might've fallen on them if they didn't.

And thanks to Boone/Cabal/The Chosen One, the handful of 'breed that survive the showdown with the humans are "freed" from Midian...so that they can go live in a barn. "I'm Peloquin, I'm a Nightbreed, and I live IN A BARN DOWN BY THE RIVER."

Ending up in a barn is really a crap ending. Midian was fine. They had a good ecosystem down there, no one was bothering them, Baphomet was a freaky cool god overseeing them, it all worked. Nothing good came out of Boone blundering in there, other than getting a bunch of them killed, all of them evicted, and then stranded in the middle of nowhere.

It would've been a triumph if they powerfully fought back, rose up, and dominated the humans or at least got recognition or made some kind of peace, but they didn't. They're way worse off than before. It's implied that maybe Boone/Cabal will find another place for them, but doesn't that mean they're just heading for another hiding place? How is that better?

In the absence of a sequel,8 it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny. A lot of this is because we're all more movie-savvy and trope-savvy now. The biggest strike against seeing "Nightbreed" now is that we have films like "Dark City," "Cronos," the "Blade" series, and "Hellboy" to compare it to. It’s been massively leapfrogged.

The fact that Barker was presenting monsters sympathetically in 1990 was huge. So if nothing else, he opened the door for movies to have likable monster protagonists. That's worth something, especially since slashers still dominated the horror airwaves at the time.9

Barker has so many interesting-looking monsters that he gives only a second or two of screen time to, and the monsters that actually get a couple scenes- we're mystified as to their motives and natures and plans. It all just feels like a missed opportunity. The best format for this story would have been a "True Detective"-style 8 or 9 episode series. Barker had a lot of ideas here and he didn't do any of them justice.

Even Decker, the psychiatrist-turned-manipulative-serial-killer. Compelling as he is, he's nuts for no clear reason.10 The movie just needs him to be crazy enough to frame Boone for murder and sic the cops on Midian. He's psycho because the script says so.

And this is a tough thing to admit, but I kind of agree with the studio for cutting all the fat out of the movie's first half-hour. Boone's girlfriend singing for five minutes,11 the redundant opening phone convo between Boone and Decker, Boone's lady visiting him at his garage,12 Boone hallucinating,13...none of that was necessary, nor did it tell us anything we didn't already know from the 1990 cut. I mean, it's kind of interesting that Boone's lady was a local rock star. And that Boone was a garage mechanic. But do either of those matter to the story? At no point in the movie does someone say to Boone's lady, "Hey, didn't I see you singing at a club one time?" or "Aren't you the lady in that band?" She’s never required to sing as a plot point. And at no point does a car break down and Boone use his garage mechanic skills to fix it. That’s a big ol’ wall of unfired Chekhov’s guns.

The 1990 cut felt choppy and abrupt without those scenes, but it also had momentum. We're rocketing right along to Midian in that version. And that worked. I don't recall what was different about the rest of the movie, aside from the ending- which was slightly better in the "Cabal Cut."

I'm gonna give the devil his due- the studio's version of the pre-Midian section of the movie is better than Barker's. Barker's has the APPEARANCE of more character development...but it's irrelevant character development, so it doesn't help the film, just bogs it down.

Stupid Meddling Film Studio: 1

Barker: 0

* * *

1. This is the "Cabal Cut," to be totally accurate. I understand there's an even longer version that's actually officially the "Director's Cut," but I'm reasonably certain this is the longest version that will ever be released.

2. The studio cut the film from 2.5 hours to 90 minutes- not a trivial amount of surgery.

3. "It's all true. God is an astronaut, Oz is over the rainbow, and Midian is where the monsters live." Classic.

4. Hey, maybe Law-defiance is transmissible by bite?

5. Which I guess Peloquin knew he was destined to do, since there's an ancient cave drawing showing him doing it? Did he just bite everyone he came near, just in case that person was the Chosen One?

6. In the book, Boone and his lady actually have sex in his jail cell during that scene. Barker really has no clue when it comes to pacing or common sense sometimes.

7. And, next to Decker, Narcisse is the only character who's not dragged from thing to thing as a plot device- he takes initiative, whether it's face-ripping or prison-breaking or evacuating people in a crisis.

8. And to be fair, Barker originally wanted this to be a trilogy.

9. And even in this film, Barker was pressured into including a couple slasher scenes- the family getting slaughtered and the guy getting stabbed and tortured to death by Decker were reshoots because the studio wanted more slasherness.

10. Is the killer doctor's huge room with all the blades and sick art at his house or office?

11. And fair enough- the singing scene isn't BAD, it just doesn't add anything. It would've worked if we found out something like she worked in an animal shelter, so that when she sees the creatures in Midian, she would connect those to her day job and feel a similar sense of needing to do "animal rescue" on them. That's a free idea. Barker can take that and reshoot the movie with it!

12. That's the only scene where his day job gets mentioned.

13. And why does he look so terrified and repulsed at a vision of himself getting sexytime with his lady? The film's director is gay, but I thought Boone was straight...


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Literateur: Brian Lumley's "Titus Crow"

Before he unleashed his "Necroscope" series1 Brian Lumley was the man behind the mythos of Sir Titus Crow.
This volume offers his first two Titus Crow novels, "The Burrowers Beneath" and "The Transition of Titus Crow." And they are barn-burners, the both of 'em!

Lumley builds on Lovecraft's mythos, name-checking each and every one of his creatures and worlds,2 but he's ultimately inverting Lovecraft.

Lovecraft's characters faint at the hint of monsters. Lumley's characters seek out monsters and fight back.3

Lovecraft is know for nihilism, despair and hopelessness. Lumley's work is lively, humorous, and imbued with a sense of wonder and optimism.4 Lumley is firmly rooted in pulp horror fiction from the 30's5 and he wears his influences on his sleeve as he transcends them.

His main protagonist, Titus Crow, is basically Doctor Who crossed with Sherlock Holmes.6 He's proactive, quick, clever, mildly clairvoyant, and relentless.

In "Burrowers," there are giant worms on the loose that give the sandworms in "Dune" a run for their money. They cause earthquakes and wreck cities everywhere they go and Titus Crow wrecks them in return!

Crow gets lost in space and time AND dimensionality in "Transition of Titus Crow." At one point, he ends up on an alien robot planet, trapped as a brain with two dangling eyes in a jar. His journey only gets weirder from there. We're talking crystal cities, visiting the ancient Romans, the Hounds of Tindalos let loose, rides on giant lisping lizards, confrontations with bubble beings of pure chaos, you name it. It flows a lot like Lovecraft's overlong "Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath," but it doesn't feel nearly as scattershot.7

The first book is largely told through letters and articles, with Lumley jumping around in search of a functional structure.8 It's at its best when we hear directly about Crow's hijinx.

Lumley's background in short stories shines through in his wonderful anecdotes about sea shoggoths, expeditions to eldritch underwater kingdoms,9 abortive deep sea drilling expeditions, monster origin stories,10 and brief visits to planets outside of space and time.

All in all, these two short novels whet the appetite for more Crow stories, since they seem like "very special episodes" of Titus Crow. I want more episodic adventures where Crow gets to crack jokes in the face of Godzilla-sized octopoid monstrosities.11

But if you like Lovecraft and wish he had more engaging and colorful protagonists, you'll definitely get a kick out of these books.12

* * *

1. Originally planned as a single book, "Necroscope" spiraled out into SIXTEEN books and counting. George R.R. Martin is notorious for stretching his planned "Song of Ice and Fire" trilogy into seven books (unless he writes more...), but Lumley has way more padding skillz!

2. He drops a "King in Yellow" reference at one point, to show he knows his pre-Lovecraft mythos, as well.

3. Robert E. Howard deserves credit for taking this approach first, though. His "Conan" stories from the 1930's basically take the unspeakable monstrosities of Lovecraft and hurl a fearless barbarian adventurer at them.

4. Also Lumley is not a frothing-at-the-mouth racist. Cthulhu's miscegenation is a major plot point, though, so Lumley tips his hat to Lovecraft's xenophobic tendencies.

5. Interestingly- this 1975 book is 40 years old and it's hearkening back to literature 40 years older than itself!

6. And like the Holmes stories, these books are largely narrated by his Watson-like assistant, de Marigny.

7. Lovecraft always had trouble with novel-length works. His style's a better fit for short stories.

8. And true- it gets bogged down by a LOT of mythos talk. If you're a fan, mythos stuff is like having a fun bull session on monsters with a friend, but if you want action and adventure, the lengthy conversations and descriptions of ancient tomes slow it down a bit much.

9. Including a revelation that the giant monster in Lovecraft's "Call of Cthulhu" wasn't actually Cthulhu, but merely one of HIS SMALLER CHILDREN!!!

10. Their origin stories actually provide scientific explanations for why certain chants and signs work to repel or defeat the monsters. Lumley thought this stuff through!

11. Or "CCD"s, as Lumley labels the "Cthulhu Cycle Deities." I understand there's a short story collection that collects all Lumley's previous Crow stories, in addition to several more volumes of Crow shenanigans- I'ma read the crap out of all of them.

12. In fact, this feels more like playing a game based in his world than his fiction. And that's fine. "Arkham Horror" is good fun:


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.