This is a new segment for my blog called "This is a Thing." This ongoing series will cover...things.
This week's thing is VidAngel.
VidAngel is an online movie service that offers the option of filtering your movies.
Irony: their logo looks like an adult film company's, |
Isn't This Censorship?
Yep. But it's voluntary. You can get movies from VidAngel and watch them totally uncut if you like. Or if you want to only delete the word "balls" and leave it uncut otherwise, you can do that, too. (But only if you have no balls.)
Companies in Utah have been trying to crack this market for years. Most notoriously, CleanFlicks was a video rental store that edited the movies themselves and re-burned them onto DVDs and rented them out to customers.
Problem: that was illegal duplication AND profiting off a product they weren't licensed to distribute AND the specific way they were editing was ruled illegal. For this and other reasons, CleanFlicks and the rest of the edited-video stores were wiped off the map under a deluge of lawsuits. (Video stores died shortly thereafter, so they probably would have disappeared, anyway.)
The whole saga was chronicled in the documentary Cleanflix, which took a dark third-act twist that I'm totally not gonna spoil here. But it's a doozy.
So How's It Work?
You start an account and set your filters to whatever you like. You want nudity gone? Click, gone. You want graphic violence gone? Click, gone. Then pick from a buffet of pottymouth and decide what words you don't want to hear.
Then you can use the website (or an app on your Roku/smart TV) to order whatever movie or show you like.
It will cost $20, as you're technically "buying" it.
Once you bought it, VidAngel will apply the filters you want and you can watch it on your computer or app or wherever.
And the next day you "sell it back" to VidAngel for $19. (You get $18 if it was an HD file.)
So the end result is: you paid $1 (SD) or $2 (HD) on a one-day movie rental. (Oh, and you can set it to automatically "sell back" the movie the next day so you don't have to worry about that step.)
It will cost $20, as you're technically "buying" it.
Once you bought it, VidAngel will apply the filters you want and you can watch it on your computer or app or wherever.
And the next day you "sell it back" to VidAngel for $19. (You get $18 if it was an HD file.)
So the end result is: you paid $1 (SD) or $2 (HD) on a one-day movie rental. (Oh, and you can set it to automatically "sell back" the movie the next day so you don't have to worry about that step.)
This Can't Be Legal
It is. (Or not? See update at bottom of article.)
It is. (Or not? See update at bottom of article.)
Now
it seems like if you own a video file- in any format- you are free to
manipulate it, remix it, censor it, do whatever you want to it. Kinda true, but
it won't hold up in court. So this site doesn't manually edit films. It just
"tags" parts of the movie that you can choose to have dropped after you buy it. It's
an automatic process. Loophole!
End
result: it's as legal as watching a DVD and hitting the "Mute"
button when a character starts cussing. Or fast-forwarding through a sex scene.
Now-
it would be illegal if you resold the movie with modified filters. Or
duplicated it. But with VidAngel, you're not re-selling it or duplicating it.
Just watching it.
It
would also be illegal, probably, if the video company modified the movie
while in their possession and
sold it to you in a modified form. That's not happening here, though. The movie
you "buy" comes to you complete and uncut. It's not modified by the
filters you choose until after you already own it.
And
they even found a way around being a rental service. The
"buy/sellback" gag keeps them in seller terrain.
It's
airtight. These guys found all the loopholes.
C'mon-
This Is At Least a Spirit of the Law Violation
Yep.
They're
totally renting movies to you under the guise of selling them and buying them
back. No doubt, no diggity.
This
loophole is like if a conservative Christian couple went to Las Vegas and got
married, had lotsa sex, then got the marriage annulled to avoid any accusations
of premarital sex.
But
it's still legal.
How
Are They Pulling This Off?
Good
question, and I don't have the answer to that.
The
filtering process is simple enough- they have a crowd-sourced army of folks
that manually tag the movies for parts that you can choose to have removed.
But
as far as getting the rights to the movies- I'm mystified.
This
service sells Game of Thrones episodes. HBO doesn't even sell Game of Thrones
episodes. You have to buy HBO- or HBO GO- to watch that show. (Consequently,
it's the most pirated show in the world.)
But
you can "buy/sellback" each episode here for $1 a pop. ($2 if you
want HD.)
Hopefully
VidAngel has the licensing rights to do this. If they don't, they're gonna get
shut down faster than you can say "winter is coming."
But
considering how legally savvy this company's been with finding the copyright and
editing loopholes, it's extremely unlikely that they'd be dumb enough not to
license the content they "sell."
But
I haven't seen their business paperwork, so I can't confirm or deny.
Alright,
Fine. How'd It Work for You?
Pretty
good. We rented The Martian and the Game of Thrones pilot.
Pros:
-The
HD image quality is perfect. This looks as good as anything on Netflix, if not
better.
-Even
SD image quality looks okay. Good choice if you wanna save $1, are watching on
a small screen, or your vision is blurry anyway.
-The
verbal filtering was mostly smooth, with audio dissolves and sometimes ambient
sound left to cover the gap of silence.
-Decent
selection. They have a bunch of brand new movies and a handful of classics.
Lots of movies that aren't available on Netflix or Amazon.
-The
VidAngel app on the Roku is great. Easy to navigate, really nice and
smooth-looking.
-It
has a "Inspiring" meter, which rates how inspiring the movie is on a
scale of 1 to 100.
-It
gives you a visual preview of how much you'll miss, audio-wise and video-wise,
with your filters set on a movie, along with how much shorter the movie will
be. Helpful for deciding if it's worth it.
Looks like the audio is more off than on for this one. |
-GREAT
PRICE. Even if you watch the movies unfiltered, $2 for an HD movie or $1 for an
SD movie is a really good deal. Cheaper than Redbox.
Cons:
-When
the verbal filtering didn't work, it was jarring and took you out of the movie.
Sometimes they delete a whole sentence just to get rid of a word and that can
be disorienting and annoying.
-The
nudity filter is confusing. We set it on "Both Men and Women,"
thinking that would cover all nudity. Nope. That only filters out scenes where
BOTH men and woman are naked. If it's just a woman or just Matt Damon's butt
strolling through the scene, it leaves them in there. You have to manually
click "Men" and "Women" if you want both gone.
-It
offers a "Disturbing Images" filter. Who decides what's disturbing?
And sometimes a scene being disturbing is the point.
Here's another review with more thoughts about the service, if you're interested. It's almost a year old, so most of the glitches mentioned in there have been fixed.
This
is Troubling. What About Respecting the Filmmakers' Artistic Vision?
You
have a point. Also VidAngel is a funny thing for me to review because I watch some
pretty toxic stuff. (I don't hide it- I discuss this junk right here on this blog!) I became a horror junkie at a very young age and I have an encyclopedic
knowledge of horror and weird cinema. I drift in and out of enthusiasm for the
genre- I'm mighty sick of the jump-scare and torture-porn subgenres- but it's remained something I love throughout life.
And I also belong to a religion that conditions its youth to believe that a movie magically
becomes immoral when the arbitrary label of "R" is applied to it. I
joined this religion as an adult, so I probably see more gray than black and white on this issue. And I admit- my opinion on this issue may be wrong. Ask me next month or next year and my opinion might change. But the last word on this religion vs.
ratings argument was dropped here. I can't say it any better. (Though I will say that the morality of Amazing Spider-Man 2 is way more troubling than anything in Shawshank Redemption.)
I
mean- from a business perspective, this thing is great. I've been saying for
years that Hollywood is stupidly leaving money on the table by not offering an
online video rental service that lets you filter movies/shows however you like.
They could expand their movies' audiences drastically if they let people watch
their movies with the nastiest stuff gone. And VidAngel pulled it off.
But
if you care about film- is an edited movie even worth watching? Is it better for people to
look at a damaged work of art or to not look at that work of art at all?
It
really depends. If integrity and vision are really important to you, this
service is not for you (Unless- again- you'd like to ignore the filters and use it to rent movies
on the cheap).
There's
a longer debate to be had about censorship and respecting a filmmaker's
intention. But the Cleanflix documentary already nailed this question pretty
well. (Angry as the Hollywood directors in that documentary got about the
notion of Cleanflicks editing their movies, I've never heard any of them complain
about their movies getting censored and shown on airplanes or network TV or basic cable. What's the difference?)
But
if movies are just a diversion for you and you don't think about them too
deeply, this is a perfectly legit way for you to watch movies without getting
hit with objectionable content that makes it harder for you to enjoy the
experience.
(Update 6/30/16: They got sued. Hard. Comes at an awkward time, as they just recently announced they're opening up for investments. I read the lawsuit paperwork and there's an awful lot of grey area in there. But the part that interests me: the studios claim Vidangel is illegally ripping movies from discs and using those as the files that they (wink-wink, nudge-nudge) "sell." I think VidAngel has a pretty solid defense on a lot of fronts, but I'm curious to see how they defend the illegal disc-ripping allegation. That smells like a "Gotcha.")
(Update 6/30/16: They got sued. Hard. Comes at an awkward time, as they just recently announced they're opening up for investments. I read the lawsuit paperwork and there's an awful lot of grey area in there. But the part that interests me: the studios claim Vidangel is illegally ripping movies from discs and using those as the files that they (wink-wink, nudge-nudge) "sell." I think VidAngel has a pretty solid defense on a lot of fronts, but I'm curious to see how they defend the illegal disc-ripping allegation. That smells like a "Gotcha.")
No comments:
Post a Comment