Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Literateur: "The Wheel of Time" by Robert Jordan

This series is 14 books long with each one clocking in at about 1,000 pages. The author died after writing 11 of them. Brandon Sanderson was picked to finish the series- on the strength of his Mistborn trilogy- and he revitalized it with his final three best-selling books.

The best advice I got about approaching Wheel of Time was "Read until you don't like it. Then stop reading."

I took this advice!
So, Book One: Eye of the World. Let's dive right in.

The prologue has the cataclysmic Portents and epic conflict of Light and Darkness and the world being Broken and overcome with The Darkness and hints that a Chosen Hero will one day be Born to Restore the Balance. Alright...

Then we're in a village with a bunch of NPC villagers doing NPC villager things. There's a hooded figure who may be a villain...or a hero! But mostly it's just NPCs wandering around. Okay...

Then the NPCs start discussing the big upcoming festival and the biggest topic of discussion is the dude who will be bringing fireworks.

......

Terry Brooks started his first Shannara book the same way. Villagers getting all excited about their village festival and a wizard comes into town with fireworks that everyone is stoked about.

I promptly threw that book across the room.

Do fantasy authors know there are other ways to start a fantasy book? Just because Tolkien started Lord of the Rings with a guy coming into town bringing fireworks for a village festival...doesn't mean every fantasy saga has to do the same!

But I really enjoy Brandon Sanderson, so I wanted to give the series a fair shot and hopefully read through it and finally get to the ones he wrote.

And heck, it isn't aggressively bad. It's just kinda bland. An easy way to describe it would be "Brandon Sanderson without humor or irony." Or, heck: "George R.R. Martin without grit or interesting plot twists."

So I kept plodding along. Nothing continued to happen. 

I recalled that everyone online and IRL told me that this series hits a wall at Book Four and then continues to suck until Book Twelve, when Sanderson took over.

Let's examine that: FANS of this series say 8 out of 14 books suck!

So I'm allegedly reading one of the exciting books in the series. Hmm...

In a world with infinite entertainment options, I couldn't in good conscience allow this book to continue taking up my leisure reading time.

So I defied the sunk cost fallacy and dropped the book cold. I pity the folks who kept reading book after book in this series because they felt like they made it that far, so they had to keep going.

I plan to read Wikipedia or fanpage summaries of the rest of these bad boys and then read the final Sanderson books that brought me here in the first place.

When you speak of me and the Wheel of Time, never let it be said that I didn't try!

But go ahead and say I didn't try very hard.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Monday, March 28, 2016

Cinemasterworks: It's "Elektra" (Woogie, Woogie, Woogie)

Season 2 of Daredevil recently dropped and we all watched it and it’s pretty much awesome. Daredevil, Elektra, and Punisher all running around and getting into shenanigans.

But I didn’t come to discuss that. I came to discuss the other movie that depicted the female assassin by the name of Elektra. That’s right- the 2005 disasterpiece Elektra.
To the best of my knowledge, no one watched the 2003 Ben Affleck Daredevil and said “You know what we need? We need a spin-off from that movie focusing on that female ninja assassin character!” Not just because the movie was awful, but because the female ninja assassin character DIED halfway through the movie. (Spoiler in that last sentence, I’m terribly sorry if I just reduced your enjoyment of the 2003 Daredevil.)

But death has always proven a marginal impediment for Marvel characters. And sure enough, Elektra is alive and well and merrily assassinating away at the start of this film. Her resurrection is explained by a series of sloppy jump-cut flashbacks where someone did a Mr. Miyagi-esque laying-on-of-hands in the ambulance to Bring Her Back To Life.

This Elektra movie does not have a good reputation. So I won’t beat up on it here. Well…let’s at least briefly mention the ninja assassin army that dissipates into stinky-looking green smoke when they die (I call them the “Death Fart Killer Squad”). The guy with animal tattoos that mutate into sloppy CGI animals that chase after the good guys (The demon-wolf death-rays shooting out of his chest are a highlight). Also the climactic battle scene has a room full of white sheets flying through the air looking exactly like the bargain basement CGI blobs that they are.

That’s enough abuse. Instead, I’ll say it’s not as jaw-droppingly awful as the Affleck Daredevil from whence it sprang. In fact, it has some competent scenes. It looks good. The color palette and cinematography are perfectly fine. (It’s directed by an X-Files veteran- he had some talent, but his feature film directing career was stopped cold by this mess.) Jennifer Garner does her best playing the character she’s assigned. Some of the supporting cast members are fun. (The long-haired biker dude from Falling Skies appears here with a haircut and he’s solid.)

And while we're having fun, her full name is Elektra Natchios. Say that out loud. You're probably now thinking what I'm thinking:
Tee-hee.

Now back to business. 

This film's biggest offense: It doesn’t let Elektra be Elektra.

Future generations will revisit this film and see it as a curious artifact of an oppressive patriarchal culture.

Is that too harsh? No, it is not.

Here’s why: the first 10 minutes consist of Elektra ninja-hopping her way from shadow to shadow, shredding her way through a small army of bodyguards. And then she dramatically assassinates her target and struts on out. This is a functional opening- well-staged, establishing her as a cold-blooded ruthless assassin. Girl power!

Then the rest of the film apologizes for that opening scene.

Elektra is an assassin. Good or evil, that’s what she is. A strong, brutal, independent female. But the three male writers of this film decided to domesticate her.

On top of giving her crippling PTSD flashbacks and severe OCD, they introduce an annoying little girl who lives next to Elektra. This girl is not interesting. Her interactions with Elektra are supposed to show us another side of Elektra and reveal a newfound mothering instinct that teaches Elektra the value of life. None of this rings true.

If that’s not enough, it turns out the little girl is a Chosen One and Elektra is assigned to assassinate her, but Elektra refuses and defends her against other assassins instead. The movie then becomes less about Elektra and more about this very not-interesting girl and how super-duper mystical martial-artsy Chosen she is.

What were they thinking? That in a spin-off movie about Elektra, they’d use it as a jumping-off point for ANOTHER character to act in her own franchise? That we’d see that little magic kung fu girl and say “Oo! I want to see HER further adventures!”???
Nope
This is the same thing Mad Max: Fury Road did. That movie is not about Mad Max, but a secondary female character named Furiosa. But Furiosa was awesome and interesting and it was a clever act of feminist subversion to put her in the lead role of a film with “Mad Max” in the title.

The little girl who steals most of the screen time in this alleged “Elektra” film is just not cool. At all. And she’s never really in any danger. Not only does she have a small army of protectors- on top of the formidable Elektra- but she also has way-too-good fighting skills. There’s no suspense, even if we did care about her fate.

Fury Road undercut the Mad Max character in an interesting way. But in turning the hardcore assassin Elektra into a mommy figure who increasingly doubts herself as she goes along (Oh, and did I mention she lets down her guard and falls in love with a boring hunky guy?), Elektra undercuts its title character in an offensive, stereotypical, retrogressive way.

Social Justice Warriors of the world should unite and attack this film! Color me #TRIGGERED!


-Phony McFakename
* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

The Best Words: March 2016

Here's everything. If you also want to see what I think was funny on Twitter, here's the link.

“Pretty sure everybody is wrong about everything.”
-Michael Ian Black

“It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations.”
-Winston Churchill

The Wizard of Oz, as you may know, is a movie about a girl who goes to a strange land and kills the first person she sees then teams up with strangers to kill again.”
-John Setear

"It makes sense that if you crossed the heedlessness of a firefighter with the anarchism of a punk rocker the result would be a person acutely aware of life’s randomness."
-Theresa Brown, The Shift

“A guy walks up to me and asks ‘What’s Punk?’ So I kick over a garbage can and say ‘That’s punk!’ So he kicks over a garbage can and says ‘That’s punk?’ and I say ‘No, that’s trendy!'”
-Billy Joe Armstrong

“He loved those vanilla cookies and Dr Peppers severely, but he loved them even more when he didn’t have to buy them. I think he saw eating my cookies and soft drinks as an accomplishment of great importance and took it as a matter of pride.”
Joe R. Lansdale, Honky Tonk Samurai

“Rascal’s handwriting was what might have been achieved by a spider on a trampoline during an earthquake.”

“Vimes had got around to a Clean Desk policy. It was a Clean Floor strategy that eluded him at the moment.”

“He hated games. They made the world look too simple. Chess, in particular, had always annoyed him. It was the dumb way the pawns went off and slaughtered their fellow pawns while the king lounged about doing nothing. If only the pawns would've united ... the whole board could've been a republic in about a dozen moves.”

“I believe the term is ‘eminent domain.’
Ah, yes. That means ‘theft by the government,”

“Ye gods, it was so much better when there were just four of us up against that bloody great dragon, Vimes thought as they walked on. Of course, we nearly got burned alive a few times, but at least it wasn't complicated. It was a damned great dragon. You could see it coming. It didn't get political on you.”
-Terry Pratchett, Thud

“I mourn for those who never knew you.”

“Are we alive, or just breathing?”
-Killswitch Engage

“You’re still breathing but you don’t know why.”

“Don’t stay in a bad place where they don’t care how you are.”

“Where shall we live in this terrible town?”


“There’s no hell like an old hell.”
-David Bowie

“Maybe we don’t want to bring flesh-eating heroin into our neighborhood.”
-Dan Wells, Bluescreen

“Seasons don’t fear the reaper
Nor do the wind, the sun or the rain”
-Blue Oyster Cult, “Don’t Fear the Reaper”

“We sleep two hours a day but we don’t fear the reaper
We eat from trees and play Minesweeper…
We weigh three tons and come from outer space
Sent here to destroy the whole human race!
Vampire blood runs through our veins
Our forked tongues wag, driving you insane…
You’ll be herded into camps when the time is right,
Where we’ll eat your brains for our delight!”
-Andy Samberg, ”Giraffes

“Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see.”
-Arthur Schopenhauer
  
“Well there you have it, baby,
I’m just a sensitive guy.
I snuffed a million planets,
But I still find time to cry.”
-Gwar, “The Road Behind”

“The more elaborate the explanation of why something failed, the less likely it is to be true.”
-Paul Graham

“The secret ideology of education: lots of DATA, but never ever any TOOLS – nothing with which to change self or politics.”
-Alain de Botton

“There's a time to be a human being and have an opinion, and there's a time to sell cars.”
-Steven Spielberg (Allegedly)

“Crazy is building your ark after the flood’s already come.”
-10 Cloverfield Lane

“I confess that, in 1901, I said to my brother Orville that men would not fly for 50 years. Two years later, we ourselves were making flights. This demonstration of my inability as a prophet gave me such a shock that I have ever since distrusted myself and have refrained from all prediction.”
-Wilbur Wright

 “Out of these inefficient tinkerings will come the future.”
-Kevin Kelly

"Now more than ever, it's evident that the old ways just don't cut it!"

"Do we wanna drop another mouse in the snake pit or send our own snake and let him crawl in?"

"Sweetheart...let us big boys have a conversation."
"Conversation. A word with four syllables. Do you want some ice before your brain overheats?"
"Ice. Yeah, you could chisel some off your heart, if you could find it!"

"I like anything fast enough to do something stupid in!"

"There are things they don't teach you in spy school!"
-xXx

“If it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to abuse a child.”
-Spotlight

Steve Wozniak: What do you do? You're not an engineer. You're not a designer. You can't put a hammer to a nail. I built the circuit board! The graphical interface was stolen! So how come ten times in a day I read Steve Jobs is a genius? What do you do?
Steve Jobs: Musicians play their instruments. I play the orchestra.

“It's not binary. You can be decent and gifted at the same time.”

“God sent his only son on a suicide mission, but people like him because he made trees.”

“Fix it.”
“I can't.”
“Who's the person who can?”
“I'm the person who can, and I can't.”

“I sat in a garage and invented the future because artists lead and hacks ask for a show of hands!”

“Why do people like you, who were adopted, feel like they were rejected instead of selected?”

-Aaron Sorkin, Steve Jobs

“Some critters like to hide under rocks. Some humans like to hide under words.”
-Anne Herbert


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Monday, March 21, 2016

Cinemasterworks: "10 Cloverfield Lane" and Sequels

10 Cloverfield Lane has been out for a couple weekends now, so if you wanted to see it, you’ve probably seen it by now.

If you don’t want it spoiled, please skip this review and read one of my other blog entries instead. (Or re-read one if you’ve already read them all. I wrote them in a layered way so you can enjoy them multiple times!)

So- since this is kind of a sequel to Cloverfield, let's talk Cloverfield.
It's about a monster that attacks Manhattan. I liked it, even though it's a- BOOO!- found-footage film. It captures the intensity of the chaotic situation really well. They took an interesting approach to the monster and left a lot of things ambiguous.

Throughout the film, we only know as much as the characters, which keeps things interesting and suspenseful as the situation escalates. It leaves you thinking about it and it begs discussion.

Now- on to 10 Cloverfield Lane.
Sequels are funny things. Some are good, some are bad. There's a 20-volume book to be written about their comparative merits and demerits. So I'm gonna skip all that and say Godfather II was good and Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance was not.

But this is not really a sequel. And that’s okay. (The world didn't need another found-footage monster film. There are enough, thank you.)

Its tense and tight trailer tells you pretty well what's up- it's a claustrophobic bunker thriller with one solid jolt after another and a great unhinged lead performance by John Goodman. A young woman awakens underground and Goodman tells her there's radiation outside and they'll die if they go out there. It he right? Is he crazy? Is he right and crazy? Is there really radiation out there? Or something worse?

It's not an indie film. It's studio produced, but they pulled it off for only $5 million. That's commendable and worth supporting with a ticket purchase to encourage The Powers That Be to not make every sf thriller a $200 million spectacle.

It's from the same production company as Cloverfield, but it was filmed under the title The Cellar. "Cloverfield" was dropped into the title about a month before its release. This was a clever trick, because it got everyone talking, trying to figure out how it's connected to that film. Heck, it's the reason I skipped out on work to see it opening day! (Got permission from the boss first. I'm a bad boy, but I'm not that bad.)

Some folks are disappointed by the end result, because it has only the loosest connection to the first film. To them I say: if you want a Cloverfield sequel, J.J. Abrams already made a movie that serves that purpose just fine- Super 8.

And here's something else no one seems to have noticed: this film resolves the biggest dangling thread from Cloverfield. (HERE COME THE SPOILERS!)
Artist's conception.
10 Cloverfield Lane indirectly explains that film's monster.

It's an alien.

They went out of their way in the first film to make you wonder if it's an alien, a sea creature, or a military genetic experiment gone wrong.

But in the last 10 minutes of 10 Cloverfield Lane- after we escape the bunker- we learn that Earth has been invaded by a variety of terrifying-looking aliens.

Now- none of them look like the Cloverfield monster, but it's not a stretch to conclude that the monster from that film was either the first alien to touch down and attack, or was just a glimpse at the invasion of Manhattan while the aliens attacked everywhere else in different ways.

So this film, like the first one, leaves a lot unsaid and lets you draw your own conclusions about what's happening. It presents a microcosm of what happened to one young woman in a bunker during this nightmare scenario, implying that there's a world of things happening beyond her, with lots of stories left to tell in its world.

And this story is told well enough, bless their hearts, I say let 'em tell whatever story they want. No matter how loosely connected.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Cinemasterworks: "Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever"

I'm just gonna list some facts here.
This film has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

According to Wikipedia, it's one of the worst films ever made.

It only made $19 million of its $70 million budget back at the box office.

The film is directed by a person named "Kaos." (Now that may sound pretty x-treme. But "Kaos" is actually short for "Wych Kaosayananda." He was a son of a Thai diplomat who lived and studied in Pakistan. The more you know.)

Now here's the rub- let's talk about the film's writer. This man I've never heard of- Alan McElroy- also wrote Left Behind, Spawn, Halloween 4, Rapid Fire, Wrong Turn, and Resident Evil. That's a man with nothing left to prove. And nothing to lose. Just like a rebel cop who doesn't play by the rules...
So let us now praise the glories of Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever.

The movie makes no sense. A kid gets kidnapped in the opening scene and we don't learn why he was kidnapped until after he's rescued in the last 10 minutes of the film. And even then, the thing that made the kid special doesn't make sense if you think about it.

Ecks and Sever are two rogue agents who fight (unnecessarily, for the most part) for the first half of the film and team up for the second half. So why the "Vs." in the title? The other well-known "Vs." movie- Freddy Vs. Jason- makes sense, because Freddy and Jason are primarily antagonists in there. Plus, they each have a strong back story. They merit a title with their names in it. But who is "Ecks" and who is "Sever" and why should a viewer approaching this film care that the two of them are in opposition? This is an unsolicited event movie that's totally uneventful.

The finale is set in what Roger Ebert calls "a smoke and fire factory." It looks like every other factory in every other film. A main character and a main bad guy throw their guns aside and have a hand-to-hand fight for no reason other than that is something that this movie has seen other movies do at this point in the movie.

There are constant explosions, chase scenes, shoot-outs, miscellaneous action...and it's still boring! Every scene plays out in a limp and lethargic way, with one shot after another delivering non-stop decaf action that just won't start.

The person who shot this film doesn't understand how to stage action or conversations or even how to set the simplest tone. The editor needs to be cited for the random slo-mo and sped-up shots too. They happen for no reason. Like most things in this film.

The music is incredibly generic. Every scene has multiple random songs playing over it, often shifting from one song to another like the sound editor got bored and changed the radio station. It sounds like a 55-year-old executive's idea of what he thinks a teenager would like.
CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE- there are four good shots in the film:

-Lucy Lui leaps past a 15-foot-tall window that shatters and sprays a mist of glass over her.
-A guy falls off a roof and the overhead camera follows him all the way to the ground and he lands on a car. (The scene doesn't appear faked, either, so someone got hurt or it had exquisite CGI.)
-An overhead shot of an exploding train car fills up the frame with an ocean of fire.
-Antonio Banderas races through a series of explosions on either side of him and one of them actually appears to spray debris and sparks on his face. (Again- he either got hurt or it was solid CGI.)

There. I've been as fair as I can be to this film. It's really not good. Everything you've heard about this legendary bad movie is true. And it's not bad enough to be enjoyed as a bad movie. It's just kind of annoying. Watch it only if you can do so with a friend who can mock it relentlessly along with you and make "Ecks" puns for 90 minutes.

"This is ECKS-cruciating!"
"Wonder if that guy's an ECKS-ecutive at ECKS-on? Or if he was fired, he'd be an ECKS-ECKS-ecutive at ECKS-on."
"Look at all those ECKS-plosions! That's just ECKS-traordinary!"


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Friday, March 11, 2016

Literateur: "400 Things Cops Know"

There's a famous line from The Crow: "It's not a good day to be a bad guy."

One could say something similar these days: "It's not a good day to be a cop."

The boys in blue are not doing great in the public eye lately. One story after another about police brutality or unjustified shootings, often with a strong racial component.

Also the increased militarization of the police force with unnecessarily extreme military surplus weaponry.

Not to mention local police routinely making use of illegally obtained information (and then lying about how it was obtained) to lock up minor law-breakers via tools that were intended to fight terrorism.

And an evolution from the 50's perspective of "cops & good guys vs. bad guys" to the current perspective of "cops vs. civilians."

And police dishonesty and corruption.

Not good, any of it.

If any of us are victims of crime, it's nice to know we can rely on our police force to help us. But for most of us, our only interactions with police officers are nuisance automotive pull-overs where they jack us for two day's pay because we went a measly 6 miles over the speed limit or failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE NO CARS OR PEDESTRIANS WITHIN SIGHT.

There was even a recent movie called Let's Be Cops that was considered controversial on the basis of its title alone. (Which was ridiculous, as the real scandal was how painfully unfunny it was- that scene where the impostor officer distracts the gangbangers by dancing? Oof.)

So this isn't the best time and place for a book with a sympathetic inside perspective on the life of a police officer.

But this is the book the world needs right now.

400 Things Cops Know is a brilliant, bitingly funny, heartfelt, and painfully honest take on life as a police officer and the world they live in and the world as they see it.

It's strong medicine to help us not excuse the misdeeds of bad cops, but to understand the mentality of officers in general, and give us a glimpse of what they deal with and what it does to their minds (and bodies). And it could even help you in your dealings with officers, as it will tell you what triggers them and what puts them at ease.

It didn't make me forget all the problems of police in our present society, but it opened up a new world to me, one well worth a closer look.

I laughed nonstop while reading it and also found myself frequently pausing and thinking about the darkness and evil in the world around me and how little of it I see with my own eyes and how lucky that makes me.

Highest recommendation.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Cinemasterworks: The End of "The Butterfly Effect"

(Full disclosure: I don't care for Ashton Kutcher. Pretty sure you don't care for him, either. With that out of the way, let's look at this movie on its own merits.)
I saw The Butterfly Effect on DVD over a decade ago and it haunts me to this day. Never watched it again. Never wanted to. It hit me too hard.

Now you may have seen The Butterfly Effect and are thinking "Huh? Why would you give that movie even a second thought?" The reason you're thinking that is probably because you saw it in the theater. Or you saw the theatrical version on DVD. That version has a studio-mandated happy ending.

The non-theatrical "unrated" version of this film has the most devastating ending that I have ever seen.

And I have seen a lot of devastating endings.

Context

To set it up for you, here's the story: a guy has childhood blackouts where he awakens and finds his life has been irreparably and inexplicably damaged each time. As an adult, he discovers the ability to send himself back in time into his own body at specific points. These points happen to match his blackouts. Every time he goes back he tries to fix the damage he's done, but every time he makes his life and the lives of his friends and loved ones worse. (Basically- his time-travel attempts to fix his life are the very things that ruin his life.)

To time-jump, he has to look at a video or memento of a moment in time, focus on it, and then his consciousness transmits there. He gets ominous hints throughout his life that he was never meant to exist; that his life is outside of time. Also: after every time-jump, he emerges back in the present with less sanity.

So by the end of the movie, he's completely lost his mind and is a gibbering mess in an institution. But he still recognizes that his involvement with the woman he loves will destroy her no matter how he tries to fix it. So he comes up with a final solution for how to protect her from him.

This is the solution: (Spoiler, obviously. Nothing R-rated in here, just the most emotionally devastating thing ever) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wSH1SpQh9c

* * *

I'll pause here. It's worth five minutes of your life.

Unless you're emotionally fragile or depression-prone, go ahead.

* * *

You make it through? Good. You okay? I presume not. I'd give you a hug right now if I could.

Obviously, that scene hits you harder in the context of the film, but HOLY CRAP, right?

No one warned me about this. I had no idea they were going there.

I was shaken for days after seeing that. And it still gets to me whenever I think about it. Much more so now that I have kids.

How To Wreck a Psyche

Let's break down the sheer brutality of this scene:
1) A fetus kills itself. The fetus has the consciousness of an adult at the time, but this is a just-about-to-be-born baby boy taking his own umbilical cord and strangling himself with it.

2) The mother loses her fourth child in a row. After three stillborn children, she experiences a fourth. In the delivery room.

3) Implication of the "fourth child" death. Her other children may have done the same thing. The ability to time-jump may be genetic, so it's highly probable that those three people also found a way to get back to their womb and destroy themselves there rather than live and damage the lives of their loved ones.

4) The most drastic heroic suicide ever. A lot of stories have ended with the main character sacrificing himself to save people. This is the first one I've seen where a character goes back before his birth and erases his own existence to save people.

5) Anti-It's a Wonderful Life ending. This movie presents the incredibly dangerous notion that maybe everyone in your life is better off without you. What if you were never born and never had a chance to hurt anyone? Would people be happier? Would loved ones suffer less? When you break down the good and the bad, are you better off never existing?

No Middle Ground

The weak-sauce original ending is here, if you feel like watching something that will make you shrug.

According to Wikipedia, they shot two other endings, too. Read about them and you'll agree: both pathetic.

There is no middle ground here.

The "director's cut" ending is the most emotionally intense ending ever. And the "theatrical" ending is the biggest cop-out in the history of cinema.

Everything in the film up to that point made it clear that any meddling in the past will have incredibly bad unintended consequences. But the cop-out ending tells us that all he had to do to fix everything was go back in time and say something mean to his beloved. This scares her off and makes her never see him again.

HUH?

Nothing worked up to that point- and he tried a LOT of things- but one little mean comment somehow makes everything okay and fixes the lives of everyone involved?

NOPE.

It's a nice thought, but I don't buy it. And it undercuts everything else the film just told us.

But Just To Be Clear

I'm not saying the "director's cut" version is a good ending. And I'm not saying it's a helpful ending. Just that's it's effective, and the right ending for this story based on the rules this story establishes.

I sincerely hope that no psychologically frail people see the brutal ending and take it to heart, thinking that suicide is a legitimate solution for the problems in your life and in the lives of loved ones.

That's a very very dangerous concept.

I've been through dark periods where I've been paralyzed by depression and the thought that not existing would be terrific. When you feel like nothing works, nothing matters, and everything you do seems to just make things worse, it's easy to think that giving up on everything is a good idea.

This couldn't be more wrong.

The old cliche is 100% true: suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. You're not just destroying everything you are, you're destroying everything you'll ever do or be. You're robbing yourself of growth and learning opportunities and inflicting unimaginable pain on the people that care about you most. Suicide is a bad idea, is what I'm getting at here.

(Euthanasia for patients in extreme and constant pain is a totally separate issue, one that I'm not gonna touch here. I'm just addressing suicide driven by emotional pain.)

When you can't think more than a few days ahead, or if you see a black void where your future is supposed to be, TALK TO SOMEONE. ANYONE. IMMEDIATELY. People care, whether you realize it or not.

Also: don't watch the unrated version of The Butterfly Effect.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Literateur: "Werewolf Smackdown" by Mario Acevedo

Got this as a Christmas present, laughed at the silly title.

Then I looked closer and saw that it was the fifth book in a series. ALARM! DANGER!

And then I realized I'd read the first book- The Nymphos of Rocky Flats- way back when. That one's about a vampire private eye investigating an outbreak of nymphomania at a nuclear power plant.

That was just about enough for me, so I skipped the sequels- X-Rated Bloodsuckers, The Undead Kama Sutra, and Jailbait Zombie. I presume they're coming-of-age dramas.

But look at this one- it's called Werewolf Smackdown!
How can you not love that?

Vampire private detective Felix Gomez is caught in a gang war between rival werewolf tribes. Shenanigans ensue!

It's fun, the writing is zippy, every chapter ends on a cliffhanger. If this sounds like a thing you'd like, you'll like it.

It has some cheese-tastically fun lines:

“We cast no shadow on the outside, but the inner shadow- the black stain of our damnation- points to the void in our soul.”

“I need this guy like I need a turd in my salad.”

“She wore a Revolutionary War period dress with the bodice cut so low she was one hiccup away from indecent exposure.”

Now enough of that. Let's talk vampires. They suck.

Ha-ha.

But seriously, I'm not a vampire guy.

As the years pass, I care less and less for these creatures. I don't find anything appealing or erotic about biting necks or wrists.

And blood-drinking is just gross. Say what you will about zombies and zombie bites, at least they forego pretense. If zombies are biting your neck or wrist, they're trying to take a big old chunk out of you in order to get you in their belly. No sexiness involved.

It's like the Hellraiser series' insistence that there's something erotic about violence and torture- I just don't get it. And I don't get why any of you get it.

I don't like sympathetic vampires because I don't sympathize with them. They exist to devour us. Stake the darned things before they bite you!

Most vampire stories are boring and repetitive. As a rule, I give them a blanket dismissal.

This is the part where my wife mocks me mercilessly, because every time she hears me say something negative about vampires and how I don't like any vampire stories, I always follow that with:

"...well, except for the books I Am Legend, 'Salem's Lot, Midnight Mass, Carpe Jugulum, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, The Keep, Dracula, The Dracula Tape, and the first section of The Passage. And the movies Nosferatu, Horror of Dracula, The Lost Boys, 'Salem's Lot, Blade II, Cronos, Near Dark, Only Lovers Left Alive, Interview With the Vampire, What We Do in the Shadows, Daybreakers, and The Monster Squad. Oh, and all the Universal Dracula films. Also Buffy and Angel are pretty fun."

So, yeah. I'm not a vampire fan. But I'm not very good at not being a vampire fan.


-Phony McFakename

* * *

Legal disclaimer: Me am on Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and YouTube and even Pinterest if that's your thing. And me books am on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and Kobo and probably some other places, too.